Teilhard de Chardin


"K. Oakley and T. de Chardin" L'Oeuvre Scientique 1971, includes letter from K.Oakley to C. Blinderman, December 1980 on Teilhard being innocent until proven guilty and 1981 letter to CB from J. Weiner

Glyn Daniel "Leakey and Piltdown" Antiquity September 1975, objects to Leakey's mistaken identification of Teilhard as hoaxer

Glyn Daniel, "Max Bégouën on Teilhard" Antiquity March 1981

Peter Costello Teilhard and the Piltdown hoax Antiquity 1981, objects to Gould's claim

Peter Costello, Piltdown Puzzle New Scientist 14 September 1981

Mary Lukas, Teilhard and the Piltdown "Hoax" America May 1981

Mary Lukas & Ellen Lukas, The haunting Antiquity 1983

Kenneth Oakley, Piltdown man Letter to New Scientist November 1981

Thomas Berry, The Piltdown Affair Teilhard Newsletter July 1980

+ Wilifred McCulloch, Some Remarks on Teilhard and the Piltdown Hoax, Teilhard Newsletter July 1981

+ Karl Schmitz-Moorman, Teilhard and the Piltdown Hoax Teilhard Newsletter July 1981

+ Notes on Chronology of Piltdown 1913-1920 Teilhard Newsletter July 1981

+ Mary Lukas, Gould and Teilhard's "Fatal Error" Teilhard Newsletter July 1981

+ Winifred McCulloch, A Reader's Guide to S. J. Gould's Piltdown Argument, Teilhard Newsletter December 1983

+ Blinderman - McCulloch Exchange Teilhard Newsletter August 1987

Thomas M. King, Teilhard and Piltdown King & Salmon, Teilhard and the Unity of Knowledge 1983

Piltdowin debate: not so elementary Science 1983, Letter by Stephen Jay Gould on Teilhard not Doyle as perpetrator; reply by Winslow & Meyer

"Blinderman-McCulloch Exchange" Teilhard News Letter August 1987.

Harold R. Booher. Science fraud at piltdown: the amateur and the priest, Antioch Review Fall 1986 maybe Teilhard

Back to the

Back to the